Saturday, April 18, 2009

Why Terrorise?

How important is it for young (and otherwise) people to be afraid of their parents?
This is something that has troubled me ever since I was a pre-teenager, and started appreciating the one glaring difference between me and my other mates (they weren't friends, and I hardly speak to any of them anymore. I met my friends later in life, and consider myself lucky to know them). But anyway, this is not about my friends and non-friends, it's about that question that has troubled me for quite some time now, and also about the glaring difference between me and most, almost all, others. That is, being scared of ma and baba. I never have been, now or ever.
Does that make me one of the bad people? Does that mean I don't love or respect my parents? I don't think so.
I have always failed to understand the big gloating hoopla parents make about how terrified their kids are of them. Years ago, when the "aunties" of the neighbourhood would prattle about it, I would notice my ma keep quiet, having no contributions to make to the terror stories. My baba, in the rare occasions that he did land into one of these gatherings, would softly but deftly put in his views: "Moon or her brother are not terrified of us, and I see no reason why they should be"...well, not always those words, but something to that effect.
As for me, I would hear stories and first-hand accounts of domestic fear-factors everyday of my life. "My dad will kill me, my mom will clobber me"... they will this, they will that, they will basically flip at every attempt that the child makes towards having an independent existence.
And I would often wonder, am I missing something in life? Is my house the weird one, where there are no death threats or the necessity to hide, hush-up, act?
It was much later that I realised how weird my house was/is. Weird in a wonderful way. I have never been terrorised of my parents, so I have never had the overwhelming need to lie to them, or to hoodwink them.
Which is why I speak to my ma as if she were a friend ( okay, I will openly accept that there are some things that I do that they don't know I do, but that is really another story. I'll let in one reason here, and that is this. I firmly believe that different people have different places in your life. So, a friend cannot fill in for parents and vice versa. Notice, I said I speak to ma as if she were a friend. Maybe I'll write about it sometime later.)
To get back on track, let's fast forward to my college days. This is when I learnt that the in-house terrorisation has nothing to do with age, and that people become so whimpy with the constant grueling throughout their childhood that they barely have any will left to stand up for themselves. So what if they are 20 by now?
"You read The God of Small Things? I heard it's meant for adults." That's a first-year graduate pursuing a degree in English Honours (who's also my immediate junior) from one of the most reputed colleges in the country.
I stare, gulp, try to disguise my disgust in an awkward smile and hide my laughter by coughing. The most I manage is "Well, yes, it is meant for adults, but aren't you already 18?" And then I walk away. Not because I have nothing more to say. Oh yes, I do, but because I figure it would all be lost on her. I later find out how her mom (or was it the dad) always had a "strict watch" over what books she read, and what movies she watched, and she would be so scared of them that she would never venture out on her own. I know, I know, this could be a boon for fresh young minds, but why is it that most of the times parents keep the "watch", kids learn to read nothing more than Sidney Sheldon and often name Femina or Vougue or Overdrive as their favourite books?
Or helplessly accept that they cannot sit through any movie that makes them exercise their cerebral facilities even a bit? As far as I have seen, the "strict watch" destroys more than it builds, and coupled with the terror factor, well....
I know someone who has always balked at the fearlessness in my family. Her idea of a perfect mother (I speak more of mothers because where and when I grew up, moms have always had more to do with the moulding of the child, as most were home-makers and were more in touch with their children's lives) was/is of someone who has absolute control over her child's life, and in return, the ideal child would drop dead for fear as soon as s/he heard "ma ke boley debo" (i'm going to tell your mom) from any quarter.
Today, her 14 year old child hides more number of things from her than I could have even begun to think is necessary at that age, has an orkut profile that she uses to make "chat friends" who call her up late at night to often whisper ugly things (I know, as I'm a confidante, and I'm never going to let out the child's identity), complains about the "demonic mother" to anyone who is willing to lend a ear, and in general, cannot wait to move out of the parental home.
But then comes the big doubt. In the form of my sibling. He and I are opposites in more than external appearances. Where I live on books, he has hardly read one outside of his syllabus, while he's a sports enthusiast, I run away from any mention of the word sports, where I have always been a smart worker (and would hence tide through my academic years with pretty decent marks), his is an eternal struggle to cross the 40-mark line.
And my parents would often call up (by now I was already away from my parent's house), worried specially about his academics, his antics with the motorbike, his fights with other boys on the block (I'm tired of telling my kid brother that the smart never get caught. At least, not while boxing each other.)
But anyway, it was then that I often thought, would it be different if he were, like others, scared to death of our parents? So he never would think of not studying when asked to, of never doing anything we was forbidden to. But then, one day, Mrs-Demon-Mother's child, who would study, eat, exercise, talk, smile all with the Ma's permission, failed to graduate to the next class.
"I have no idea what happened. The child would be at the study table for as long as I asked. She never dared disobey. How could this happen?" wondered the mom.
My ma calls me to update me on how my brother, yet again, managed to clear by the skin of his teeth. And on the mom-in-question's predicament.
I sigh and laugh at the same time. Yes, the child would sit at the study table...thinking of newer and better ways to hoodwink you, knowing that the simple way of saying "Mom, I really don't want to study for so long today, can I get off this once" wasn't an option.
And thinking about it, my kid brother might have his faults, but we know well enough to trust him. Where play-acting is increasingly becoming the thing to do within families, mine is one where we talk, laugh, shout, scream, love, yell at each other without the slightest pretence, or the slightest misgivings.
So there, guess, I know the answer to my question now.





1 comment:

Ayan said...

"Kaam gandha hain, par karna paRta hain". Yes, I am quoting from a Nazibadi Hindi movie, but that's how most elders define their responsibilities in our country. Be it parents at home, or even teachers at premier institutions dealing with adult students. Because, to them, freedom is a nice concept, but should be handled with care. The parents and teachers who terrorize the younger people are actually afraid that the other side may discover that they are NOT weaker. That is the reason a kid is stopped in the middle of an argument. S/he is accused of speaking too much when s/he speaks a harsh truth. Most of our senior citizens don't know how to handle it and never intend those down the generations to be endowed with that faculty of understanding.

I teach at an Institute where I often face smart questions in the classes which I need to think over to reply. In the 1st year of my teaching, if I would need to take my time to answer, there would be murmurs at the back benches that would flow towards me like a Mexican wave that would make me nervous and at times, irritated by the disturbances and the impatience. My students might have cleared one of the toughest exams of the world, but very few of them are ready to accept that a teacher might take so long to answer a question. I found out that most of the other teachers handle it by promising to answer it later, which I too found a smart move. But I would prefer if my students could allow me to take more time, and even let me say after 5-10 minutes, "Sorry, I can't solve this problem now".

Our lingo is full of proverbs like AK PMG (Aam Kha, Per Mat Ginn), Dimag Mat Lagao, Goli Maaro Bheje Mein. Bertrand Russell once wrote, "Many people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do" - and we follow that religiously in all our institutions. We hanker for the fruit, we don't enjoy the journey. That's why our parents and teachers prefer the kids to be robots bounded by rules exercised by sticks and carrots. I don't mean that rules are unnecessary, they do help the kids to understand the constraints of reality, prepare them for the bigger world they will be facing in a decade or lesser duration. But they shouldn't be stopped from asking the questions just because we are afraid that we don't have a good answer ready with us. But most of us inherit the fear of being identified as "fools" and prefer to terrorize the lot - "spare the rod, spoil the kid" is the mantra that the hypocrite elders use to shield their foolishness in the name of betterment of the kids' prospects.
And hence display a foolishness of a higher dimension.

where the mind is without fear and the head is held high..

where the mind is without fear and the head is held high..